GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 6.7 | −74.3% Qwen3 14B (Non-reason… is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.66s | 6.89s | −88.6% Qwen3 14B (Non-reason… is 88.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.12 / $0.24 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-14b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-14b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill