GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.10
Total cost
$1487
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.17.2−72.4% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 72.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,486.78Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)64.38s91.88s+42.7% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 42.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.28 / $4.07$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.1 (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill