GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.110.8−58.6% Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reaso… is 58.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,486.78Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)61.77s35.92s−41.8% Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reaso… is 41.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.28 / $4.07$0.03 / $0.15
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-5-4b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-5-4b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill