GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 13.3 | −49.0% Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reaso… is 49.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 61.77s | 7.06s | −88.6% Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reaso… is 88.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.17 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-5-9b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-5-9b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill