GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max Thinking. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.10
Total cost
$1487
AlibabaQwen3 Max ThinkingNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
21.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Qwen3 Max ThinkingDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.121.3−18.4% Qwen3 Max Thinking is 18.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,486.78Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)60.76sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.28 / $4.07—
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.1 (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3 Max Thinking: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-max-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/qwen3-max-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill