GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 (Xhigh)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5.4 (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
39.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.4 (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.439.0+74.1% GPT-5.4 (Xhigh) is 74.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.88s131.01s+3276.5% GPT-5.4 (Xhigh) is 3276.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$2.50 / $15.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-5.4 (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-5-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-5-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill