GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
45.80
Total cost
$1537
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.445.8+104.5% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 2.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,536.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.88s11.63s+199.7% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 199.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$10.0 / $50.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Astra (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill