GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra (Medium)Off the frontier
Intelligence
49.60
Total cost
$2434
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Astra (Medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.449.6+121.4% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 2.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,434.12— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.91s14.07s+259.8% GPT-6 Astra (Medium) is 259.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$10.0 / $50.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Astra (Medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill