GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Max)On the frontier
Intelligence
38.10
Total cost
$122
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.438.1+70.1% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 70.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$122.05— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.91s86.79s+2119.7% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 2119.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill