GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (High)On the frontier
Intelligence
32.90
Total cost
$47.9
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.432.9+46.9% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 46.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$47.85— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.88s12.43s+220.4% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 220.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill