GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)On the frontier
Intelligence
34.60
Total cost
$66.8
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.434.6+54.5% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 54.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$66.81— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.84s28.32s+637.5% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 637.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.10 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill