GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-120b (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b (Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)gpt-oss-120b (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.410.2−54.5% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 54.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s10.14s+160.0% gpt-oss-120b (Low) is 160.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.13 / $0.59
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itgpt-oss-120b (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-120b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill