GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-20b (High)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs gpt-oss-20b (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
OpenAIgpt-oss-20b (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
9.00
Total cost
$28.8
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)gpt-oss-20b (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.49.0−59.8% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 59.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$28.81— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s16.48s+322.6% gpt-oss-20b (High) is 322.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.05 / $0.22
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itgpt-oss-20b (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-20b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/gpt-oss-20b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill