GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 3B

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 3B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
IBMGranite 4.2 3BOn the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
9.10
Total cost
$14.9
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Granite 4.2 3BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.49.1−59.4% Granite 4.2 3B is 59.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$14.91— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.91s49.98s+1178.3% Granite 4.2 3B is 1178.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.03 / $0.12
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGranite 4.2 3B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/granite-4-2-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/granite-4-2-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill