GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (High)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.6 (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok 4.6 (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
44.30
Total cost
$1963
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.6 (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.444.3+97.8% Grok 4.6 (High) is 97.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,962.90— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.88s31.72s+717.5% Grok 4.6 (High) is 717.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGrok 4.6 (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/grok-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/grok-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill