GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok Build 0.1 0616

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Grok Build 0.1 0616. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
SpaceXAIGrok Build 0.1 0616Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
27.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Grok Build 0.1 0616Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.427.2+21.4% Grok Build 0.1 0616 is 21.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.83s37.23s+872.1% Grok Build 0.1 0616 is 872.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$1.00 / $2.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGrok Build 0.1 0616: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/grok-build-0-1-06-16 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/grok-build-0-1-06-16?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill