GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 4 ScoutOff the frontier
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
$73.6
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Llama 4 ScoutDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.46.5−71.0% Llama 4 Scout is 71.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$73.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.91s4.99s+27.6% Llama 4 Scout is 27.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.18 / $0.66
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itLlama 4 Scout: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill