GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.7

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M2.7. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M2.7Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.422.8+1.8% MiniMax-M2.7 is 1.8% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s56.13s+1339.2% MiniMax-M2.7 is 1339.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M2.7: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill