GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3Off the frontier
Intelligence
29.20
Total cost
$538
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M3Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.429.2+30.4% MiniMax-M3 is 30.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$537.98— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s25.47s+553.1% MiniMax-M3 is 553.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.30 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M3: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill