GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3.1-FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
42.70
Total cost
$283
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.442.7+90.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 90.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$283.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.91s23.52s+501.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 501.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.15 / $0.60
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itMiniMax-M3.1-Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill