GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
MistralMistral Medium 3.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
14.20
Total cost
$1264
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.414.2−36.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 36.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,263.80— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s17.77s+355.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 355.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$1.50 / $7.50
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itMistral Medium 3.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill