GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
NVIDIANemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.80
Total cost
$1319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.412.8−42.9% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 42.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,318.62— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.84s16.18s+321.4% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 321.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill