GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.422.9+2.2% Qwen3.5 27B (Reasonin… is 2.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s37.90s+871.8% Qwen3.5 27B (Reasonin… is 871.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.30 / $2.40
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.5 27B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill