GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 Omni FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.5 Omni FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.412.5−44.2% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 44.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.83s3.94s+2.9% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 2.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.10 / $0.80
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3.5 Omni Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-omni-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/qwen3-5-omni-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill