GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Sarvam 105B (High)

GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) vs Sarvam 105B (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
SarvamSarvam 105B (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Sarvam 105B (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.48.8−60.7% Sarvam 105B (High) is 60.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)3.90s14.79s+279.2% Sarvam 105B (High) is 279.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.04 / $0.17
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats itSarvam 105B (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/sarvam-105b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2-non-reasoning/sarvam-105b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill