GLM-5.2 (Max) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 24.0% more intelligence, 85.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | GLM-5.3-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 41.8 | +24.0% GLM-5.3-Flash is 24.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $305.52 | −85.4% GLM-5.3-Flash is 85.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.10s | 39.33s | +30.7% GLM-5.3-Flash is 30.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.15 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM-5.2 (Max)GLM-5.3-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill