GLM-5.2 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 12.8% more intelligence, 43.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 38.0 | +12.8% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 12.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $1,186.77 | −43.4% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 43.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.81s | 28.74s | −3.6% GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is 3.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.2 (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-5-6-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill