GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 42.7% more intelligence, 4.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 154.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 48.1 | +42.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 42.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $2,000.35 | −4.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 4.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.78s | 75.86s | +154.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 154.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.2 (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill