GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)

Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.

Trade-off

Z AIGLM-5.2 (Max)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 33.70
Total cost: $2097

MetaMuse Wonder (Max)Off the frontier

Intelligence: 52.40
Total cost: $5787

Verdict

Depends on your budget

Muse Wonder (Max) scores 18.7 points higher (52.4 vs 33.7) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $2097; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.2 (Max).

Metric	GLM-5.2 (Max)	Muse Wonder (Max)	Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)	33.7	52.4	+55.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 55.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)	$2,097.29	$5,786.78	+175.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.8× more expensive
End-to-end time (lower is better)	30.10s	41.43s	+37.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 37.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)	$1.40 / $4.40	$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalities	Text	Text, Image, Speech, Video

Muse Wonder (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 55.5% more intelligence, 175.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.6% slower end-to-end.

Open this matchup in the interactive picker GLM-5.2 (Max): what beats it Muse Wonder (Max): what beats it

Today's Pareto frontier

Against the frontier

GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.

GLM-5.2 (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model

Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill