GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 20.9 points higher (33.7 vs 12.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $1319; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 12.8 | −62.0% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 62.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $1,318.62 | −37.1% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 37.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.81s | 16.19s | −45.7% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 45.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 62.0% less intelligence, 37.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.2 (Max)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill