GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
GLM-5.2 (Max) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 7.7 | −77.2% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 77.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.14s | 24.79s | −11.9% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 11.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.47 / $0.49 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill