GLM-5.2 (max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

GLM-5.2 (max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
38.60
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
10.10
Total cost
$476
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (max)Qwen3 Coder NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)38.610.1−73.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$476.03— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)41.06s5.52s−86.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 86.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.35 / $1.20
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (max): what beats itQwen3 Coder Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill