GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 25.2% less intelligence, 294.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.5 | 43.0 | −25.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 25.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $138.02 | $544.58 | +294.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 62.44s | 60.38s | −3.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
GLM-5.3-FlashKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill