GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GLM 5.3 Flash by Z AI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM 5.3 Flash: 38.3% less intelligence, 254.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 54.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM 5.3 Flash | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 25.8 | −38.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 38.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $280.28 | $992.88 | +254.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.64s | 47.33s | +54.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 54.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM 5.3 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM 5.3 FlashKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill