GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.8% more intelligence, 32.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 46.3 | +10.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 10.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $206.66 | −32.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 32.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 48.29s | +22.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 22.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.3-FlashMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill