GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ministral 3 8B
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Ministral 3 8B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 36.3 points higher (41.8 vs 5.5) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $27.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3-Flash when you need intelligence above 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B when 5.5 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Ministral 3 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 5.5 | −86.8% Ministral 3 8B is 86.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $27.47 | −91.0% Ministral 3 8B is 91.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.79s | 4.90s | −87.0% Ministral 3 8B is 87.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.15 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 8B vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 86.8% less intelligence, 91.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ministral 3 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
GLM-5.3-FlashMinistral 3 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/ministral-3-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/ministral-3-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill