GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 6.3 points higher (48.1 vs 41.8) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $306; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 41.8, and GLM-5.3-Flash when 41.8 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 48.1 | +15.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 15.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $2,000.35 | +554.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 6.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 84.79s | +115.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 115.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 15.1% more intelligence, 554.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 115.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.3-FlashMuse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill