GLM-5.3-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 32.9 points higher (41.8 vs 8.9) but costs 4.8× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3-Flash when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 8.9 | −78.7% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 78.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $63.74 | −79.1% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 79.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.02s | 10.29s | −72.2% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 72.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 78.7% less intelligence, 79.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GLM-5.3-FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill