GLM-5.3-Flash vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.3% less intelligence, 64.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 24.1 | −42.3% Solar Mini 4 is 42.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $502.02 | +64.3% Solar Mini 4 is 64.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 38.89s | 27.46s | −29.4% Solar Mini 4 is 29.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GLM-5.3-FlashSolar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill