GLM-5.3 (Low) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 12.8 points higher (34.3 vs 21.5) but costs 95× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $10.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 21.5 | −37.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 37.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $10.63 | −99.0% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 99.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.92s | 7.32s | −76.3% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 76.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 37.3% less intelligence, 99.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.3 (Low)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill