GLM-5.3 (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 5.8 points higher (34.3 vs 28.5) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $449; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 28.5 | −16.9% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 16.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $449.37 | −55.6% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 55.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.49s | 5.52s | −82.5% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 82.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 16.9% less intelligence, 55.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GLM-5.3 (Low)GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill