GLM-5.3 (Low) vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 28.9% more intelligence, 15.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 44.2 | +28.9% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 28.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $854.60 | −15.6% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 15.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.40s | 42.26s | +34.6% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 34.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GLM-5.3 (Low)GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/gpt-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill