GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 2.2 points higher (25.3 vs 23.1) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3922 vs $1219; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 23.1, and GLM-5.3 (Low) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.1 | 25.3 | +9.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 9.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,218.55 | $3,922.39 | +221.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.49s | 24.37s | −31.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 31.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 9.5% more intelligence, 221.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 55.30 for $3746.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/mistral-large-4-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/mistral-large-4-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill