GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 23.0 points higher (34.3 vs 11.3) but costs 24× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $42.5; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 11.3 | −67.1% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 67.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $42.50 | −95.8% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 95.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.21s | 14.50s | −53.5% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 53.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 67.1% less intelligence, 95.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill