GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 10.8 points higher (45.1 vs 34.3) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $1013; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.3 (Low).
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 45.1 | +31.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 31.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $1,655.27 | +63.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 63.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.21s | 29.94s | −4.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 4.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 31.5% more intelligence, 63.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill