GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 18.1 points higher (52.4 vs 34.3) but costs 5.7× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1013; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 34.3, and GLM-5.3 (Low) when 34.3 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 52.4 | +52.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 52.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $5,786.78 | +471.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 5.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.17s | 40.70s | +30.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 30.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 52.8% more intelligence, 471.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill