GLM-5.3 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.3 (Max): 0.7% more intelligence, 33.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 45.1 | +0.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 0.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,503.48 | $1,655.27 | −33.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 33.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.61s | 29.94s | −5.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 5.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.3 (Max)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill