GLM-5.3 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Max) scores 18.3 points higher (44.8 vs 26.5) but costs 8.8× as much to run the benchmark ($2503 vs $286; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 26.5 | −40.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 40.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,503.48 | $286.07 | −88.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 88.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.27s | 6.31s | −77.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 77.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GLM-5.3 (Max): 40.8% less intelligence, 88.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM-5.3 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill