GLM-5.3 (max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (max) by Z AI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (max) scores 34.8 points higher (44.9 vs 10.1) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2503 vs $476; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (max) when you need intelligence above 10.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 10.1 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (max) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.9 | 10.1 | −77.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 77.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,503.48 | $476.03 | −81.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 81.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.97s | 5.52s | −85.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 85.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GLM-5.3 (max): 77.5% less intelligence, 81.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (medium) scores 49.70 for $2434.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GLM-5.3 (max)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill