GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | GLM-5 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 7.7 | −64.7% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 64.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.92s | 22.49s | +152.1% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 152.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $3.20 | $0.47 / $0.49 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-non-reasoning/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-non-reasoning/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill